Full-Text Search:
Home|Journal Papers|About CNKI|User Service|FAQ|Contact Us|中文
《Well Logging Technology》 2006-01
Add to Favorite Get Latest Update

Overview of High-angle and Horizontal Well Formation Evaluation:Issues,Learning,and Future Directions

Quinn R Passey~1,H Yin~1,C M Rendeiro~1,D E Fitz~2(1.ExxonMobil Upstream Research Co.,Houston,Texas;2.ExxonMobil Exploration Co.,Houston,Texas)  
Highangle and horizontal(HA/HZ) wells are commonly drilled and often the logging suite is selected primarily to aid geosteering the well to a specific target.In many situations,these wells penetrate zones or portions of the reservoir for which no vertical appraisal wells are available.In these situations,the logs acquired will be used for routine formation evaluation of nettogross,porosity,and possibly water saturation.Comparison of log responses in HA/HZ wells indicates that significant differences can exist.For example,recent studies show that porosity values can be off as much as 6 p.u.,water saturation uncertainty can exceed 50%,and true stratigraphic thickness can be off by 200%~300% because of uncertainty in apparent dip in highly deviated wells.Thus,routine formation evaluation approaches for vertical wells may not be adequate for accurate characterization of formations and fluids in HA/HZ wells.Many causes for different responses exist,but most relate to the fact that many logging tools were designed for vertical wells with nearhorizontal strata.In extremely highangle to horizontal wellbores,our interpretation schemes must be modified to account for 1)geometry of bed relative to the borehole,2) circumferential direction of the measurement,3) formation anisotropic effects on resistivity,acoustic,and nuclear responses,4) unusual invasion profiles,and 5) gravity causingeccenteringoftoolsandcuttingsbedaccumulationonthebottomofthewellbore.Althoughborehole image logs may be the best approach for characterizing relative bed dip in nearhorizontal wellbores,issues still exist in obtaining sufficiently accurate dips when wellbore deviation exceeds 80°.Cuttings beds can have a significant effect on both density and nuclear log responses.Since logging of these wellbores is challenging,it is critical to establish a protocol for distinguishing poor log responses from "unusual" log response just due to geometry,anisotropy,and other borehole effects.The standard qualitative use of logs in HA/HZ wells for geosteering would not be sufficient for many future situations.In many locations vertical assessment wells cannot be drilled and it is critical to evaluate formations using extended reach wells(e.g.,drilling from onshore to reach reservoirs offshore).Our current interpretation schemes developed for nearvertical wells often are not adequate for HA/HZ wells.Addressing these challenges will require collaboration between the operating companies and service companies to share current limitations of tool responses and assist in interpreting HA/HZ wells.Both operators and service companies agreed that some new tool designs are required to obtain quantitative characterization from HA/HZ wells.
【CateGory Index】: P631.84
Download(CAJ format) Download(PDF format)
CAJViewer7.0 supports all the CNKI file formats; AdobeReader only supports the PDF format.
©2006 Tsinghua Tongfang Knowledge Network Technology Co., Ltd.(Beijing)(TTKN) All rights reserved