Full-Text Search:
Home|Journal Papers|About CNKI|User Service|FAQ|Contact Us|中文
《Social Sciences in Ningxia》 2019-02
Add to Favorite Get Latest Update

Analogy and Absurdity:the Comparisons between Chinese and Western Principle of Philosophical Argumentation Starting from Mohist and Ancient Greek Debate

Zhang Wanqiang;  
Logical thought or logic existing in the Pre-Qin philosophical texts or not is an important thesis debating by the in researchers on logic history for many years. This thesis concerns the judgement on the Chinese logic thought,effects the character of the Chinese logic mode of thinking,also the judgement and writing on the Chinese history of thought,cultural history and philosophical history. Philosophical argumentation is a significant factor to create and develop the logical thought and ideological argumentation. The Mohist debate is the climax of the Chinese philosophical argumentation,and the"midwifery"is the paragon of using ancient Greek debate. The comparisons between the Mohist and ancient Greek debate are helpful to explain the difference between Chinese and western philosophical argumentation.
【Fund】: 教育部人文社会科学研究规划青年基金项目“墨家‘民本’理念的政治哲学研究”(项目编号:18YJC720031)
【CateGory Index】: B224;B502.23
Download(CAJ format) Download(PDF format)
CAJViewer7.0 supports all the CNKI file formats; AdobeReader only supports the PDF format.
©2006 Tsinghua Tongfang Knowledge Network Technology Co., Ltd.(Beijing)(TTKN) All rights reserved